One could exist without any license of any kind, but it would be
an incredible hassle. I know several people who have vigorously
lived their "right to travel" and often paid the price to the extent
that they couldn't travel much at all due to impounded cars and
incessant court appearances.
Even ML very likely has a DL, and I wouldn't think a whit less of her for it.
Choose the right hills to fight for and die on, I guess.
It's all about balance, and some degree of pragmaticim is required in Life.
This offends my idealist nature, of course, but I'm now old enough to accept
what I truly must, and thus move on.
If getting a license effectively allows you more training and thus more skill,
then acquiescing has its benefits. The total nonlicensee (these days)
would experience huge isolation and a meager skillset. Is that worth it?
Your call.
__________
If the FCC were merely a traffic light analog, that'd be one thing.
But, they're not. Another sign of the times . . .
The tattle-tale reputation of some hams has always rankled me.
If a non-licensed ham (who had passed all his tests and otherwise
followed all the rules) was on the air, why should licensed hams object?
Similarly, if a trained/safe person concealed-carried his handgun, what
basis would the CCWer have to report him?
__________
That 2ยข in, I wish you FSWer hams well! I may try it myself!
Boston